Claude Code security review vs Tembo
Claude Code security review (Anthropic) and Tembo (Tembo Data Systems) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Claude Code security review |  Tembo |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | Tembo Data Systems |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Business operations |
| Summary | Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments. | Agent orchestration platform (not a dedicated AppSec scanner) that opens auto-fix PRs from Snyk vulnerability scans and Sentry production errors. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, pr review, sast, vulnerability management | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key. | Published on tembo.io/pricing: free trial; Pro $60/month ($60 usage allowance, up to 5 users); Max $200/month (up to 10 users); Enterprise custom. Usage allowance covers Tembo Gateway tokens and cloud VM compute; overages optional on paid plans. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code | https://docs.tembo.io/integrations/snyk |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code | https://www.tembo.io/ |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 12 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
More Claude Code security review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Claude Code security review
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Claude Code security review
- Claude Code security review vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Claude Code security review vs Cursor Bugbot