Home / Agents / Claude Code security review

Claude Code security review

Name: Claude Code security review
Availability: OnlineOnly
Author: Anthropic

Vendor: Anthropic · HQ: United States · Category: Code security · Security

Last verified 18 Oct 2026 · Added 18 Oct 2026 · 4 sources · How we verify

Visit official site (opens in new tab) Claim this listing

Vendor? Get your “Listed on Agent Index” badge

What it does

Anthropic documents automated security reviews in Claude Code. Developers can run /security-review in the terminal to analyse pending changes; a GitHub Action (anthropics/claude-code-security-review) can review pull requests and post comments. Anthropic’s help centre and blog list checks for common patterns including SQL injection, XSS, authentication/authorisation flaws, insecure data handling and dependency vulnerabilities (vendor-claimed coverage). The GitHub Action repository states it is not hardened against prompt injection and should only review trusted PRs. Anthropic labels the features as a complement to, not a replacement for, existing security practices. Availability is described for Claude Code users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and API Console accounts.

Frameworks

No framework tags verified yet.

Pricing (as published)

Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key.

India relevance

PR and local review of common vulnerability classes is relevant to secure-development programmes, including CERT-In-oriented handling. Anthropic does not market a CERT-In module.

Tasks

appsecpr-reviewsastvulnerability-management

Sources

Last verified 18 Oct 2026. Framework tags indicate relevance, not certification; “vendor-claimed” items are as marketed by the vendor. Spotted an error? Submit a correction or email sales@heritageservices.online. See our methodology.

Not legal or audit advice. Confirm current pricing, framework coverage and India-regulatory claims with the vendor before purchasing.

Use-case comparisons

AI code security agents — 12 verified listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)

Compare Claude Code security review with

Alternatives

Aikido AI AutoFix — Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ.
Amazon Q Developer security scanning — Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes.
Checkmarx One Assist — Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel.
Codacy AI Reviewer — Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes.
Cursor Bugbot — Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes.
Devin — Cognition’s autonomous coding agent. Listed here only for documented Snyk MCP/CLI scanning and SonarQube/Snyk/Checkmarx IDE plugins — not as a dedicated security product.

See all Claude Code security review alternatives →

Stay updated

We use your email only to send the newsletter. See our privacy policy.