Cursor Bugbot

Vendor: Anysphere · HQ: United States · Category: Code security · Security

Last verified 18 Oct 2026 · Added 18 Oct 2026 · 4 sources · How we verify

Visit official site (opens in new tab) Claim this listing

Vendor? Get your “Listed on Agent Index” badge

What it does

Bugbot is Cursor’s automated PR review product. Cursor docs state that it analyses PR diffs, leaves comments with explanations and fix suggestions, can run on each PR update or on a manual trigger (cursor review / bugbot run), and supports GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps and Origin after the repository is connected. Findings can include security issues; this is a general PR reviewer, not a dedicated SAST scanner. Cursor documents CI check statuses, optional fail-on-unresolved-issues, .cursor/BUGBOT.md rules, and a Bugbot API for enterprise teams. Vendor-claimed accuracy figures (for example that more than half of reported bugs are eventually fixed by engineers) are as marketed on cursor.com/bugbot.

Frameworks

No framework tags verified yet.

Pricing (as published)

Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team.

India relevance

PR review that flags security issues can support secure SDLC programmes. Cursor does not market a CERT-In module.

Tasks

pr-reviewappsecremediation

Sources

1. cursor.com/docs/bugbot (primary)
2. cursor.com/bugbot
3. cursor.com/help/ai-features/bugbot.md
4. cursor.com/terms-of-service

Last verified 18 Oct 2026. Framework tags indicate relevance, not certification; “vendor-claimed” items are as marketed by the vendor. Spotted an error? Submit a correction or email sales@heritageservices.online. See our methodology.

Use-case comparisons

• AI code security agents — 12 verified listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)

Compare Cursor Bugbot with

• Aikido AI AutoFix vs Cursor Bugbot
• Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Cursor Bugbot
• Checkmarx One Assist vs Cursor Bugbot
• Claude Code security review vs Cursor Bugbot
• Codacy AI Reviewer vs Cursor Bugbot
• Devin vs Cursor Bugbot
• Cursor Bugbot vs Factory Droids
• Cursor Bugbot vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
• Cursor Bugbot vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
• Cursor Bugbot vs GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution

Alternatives

• Aikido AI AutoFix — Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ.
• Amazon Q Developer security scanning — Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes.
• Checkmarx One Assist — Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel.
• Claude Code security review — Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments.
• Codacy AI Reviewer — Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes.
• Devin — Cognition’s autonomous coding agent. Listed here only for documented Snyk MCP/CLI scanning and SonarQube/Snyk/Checkmarx IDE plugins — not as a dedicated security product.

See all Cursor Bugbot alternatives →

Stay updated