Aikido AI AutoFix
Vendor: Aikido Security · HQ: Belgium · Category: Code security · Security
Last verified · Added · 5 sources · How we verify
Visit official site (opens in new tab) Claim this listing
Vendor? Get your “Listed on Agent Index” badge
What it does
Aikido documents AutoFix as a core remediation workflow: it generates concrete, reviewable patches for open-source dependencies, application code, infrastructure as code, containers, pentest findings and AI code-audit issues, delivered as PRs, CI gating and IDE fixes. Product pages describe an AI Agent for SAST and IaC AutoFix. Aikido’s about page lists a US HQ in San Francisco and a European HQ at Keizer Karelstraat 15, 9000 Ghent, Belgium, and a Europe office page says the company was born in Belgium; product JSON-LD uses addressCountry BE. This listing uses Belgium as HQ on that basis. Public dollar pricing is on aikido.dev/pricing.
Frameworks
No framework tags verified yet.
Pricing (as published)
Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page.
India relevance
Automated patches for SAST/SCA findings can support CERT-In-oriented vulnerability handling. Aikido does not market a CERT-In module.
Tasks
appsecremediationsastvulnerability-managementiac
Sources
- aikido.dev/code/autofix (primary)
- help.aikido.dev/autofix-and-remediation/overview-aikido-autofix
- aikido.dev/company/about
- aikido.dev/company/europe-office
- aikido.dev/pricing
Last verified 18 Oct 2026. Framework tags indicate relevance, not certification; “vendor-claimed” items are as marketed by the vendor. Spotted an error? Submit a correction or email sales@heritageservices.online. See our methodology.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 12 verified listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Compare Aikido AI AutoFix with
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Cursor Bugbot
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Devin
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Factory Droids
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution
Alternatives
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning — Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes.
- Checkmarx One Assist — Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel.
- Claude Code security review — Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments.
- Codacy AI Reviewer — Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes.
- Cursor Bugbot — Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes.
- Devin — Cognition’s autonomous coding agent. Listed here only for documented Snyk MCP/CLI scanning and SonarQube/Snyk/Checkmarx IDE plugins — not as a dedicated security product.
See all Aikido AI AutoFix alternatives →
Stay updated
We use your email only to send the newsletter. See our privacy policy.