Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and GitHub Copilot coding agent (GitHub) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Aikido AI AutoFix |  GitHub Copilot coding agent |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | GitHub |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Business operations |
| Summary | Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ. | GitHub Copilot’s coding agent. Listed here only for the official workflow that assigns Dependabot security alerts to Copilot (or other agents) to open a draft fix PR. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, sast, vulnerability management, iac | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. | Requires a Copilot plan that includes coding agent (Copilot Pro is $10/month with included AI credits on github.com/features/copilot/plans) plus GitHub Code Security for assigning Dependabot alerts ($30 per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans; public repos differ). Coding-agent sessions consume GitHub AI credits. |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://github.blog/changelog/2026-04-07-dependabot-alerts-are-now-assignable-to-ai-agents-for-remediation/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/coding-agent |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Aikido AI AutoFix or GitHub Copilot coding agent. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Devin — Cognition’s autonomous coding agent. Listed here only for documented Snyk MCP/CLI scanning and SonarQube/Snyk/Checkmarx IDE plugins — not as a dedicated security product. · Devin pair comparison
- Factory Droids — Factory’s Droid coding agents. Listed here only because Factory’s own pages document Snyk Studio integration for scan/fix/verify inside Droid workflows. · Factory Droids pair comparison
- Tembo — Agent orchestration platform (not a dedicated AppSec scanner) that opens auto-fix PRs from Snyk vulnerability scans and Sentry production errors. · Tembo pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 12 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
More Aikido AI AutoFix comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Cursor Bugbot