Claude Code security review vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
Claude Code security review (Anthropic) and GitHub Copilot coding agent (GitHub) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Claude Code security review |  GitHub Copilot coding agent |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | GitHub |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Business operations |
| Summary | Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments. | GitHub Copilot’s coding agent. Listed here only for the official workflow that assigns Dependabot security alerts to Copilot (or other agents) to open a draft fix PR. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, pr review, sast, vulnerability management | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key. | Requires a Copilot plan that includes coding agent (Copilot Pro is $10/month with included AI credits on github.com/features/copilot/plans) plus GitHub Code Security for assigning Dependabot alerts ($30 per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans; public repos differ). Coding-agent sessions consume GitHub AI credits. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | freemium |
| Primary source | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code | https://github.blog/changelog/2026-04-07-dependabot-alerts-are-now-assignable-to-ai-agents-for-remediation/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code | https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/coding-agent |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 12 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Claude Code security review alternatives
- GitHub Copilot coding agent alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Claude Code security review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Claude Code security review
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Claude Code security review
- Claude Code security review vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Claude Code security review vs Cursor Bugbot