Devin vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
Devin (Cognition) and Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Devin |  Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cognition | Escape |
| HQ | United States · North America | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Business operations | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Cognition’s autonomous coding agent. Listed here only for documented Snyk MCP/CLI scanning and SonarQube/Snyk/Checkmarx IDE plugins — not as a dedicated security product. | Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, appsec | appsec, pen test management, attack surface |
| Pricing (as published) | Self-serve plans on devin.ai/pricing: Free $0; Pro $20/month; Max $200/month; Teams $80/month minimum plus $40/month per full seat; Enterprise custom (ACUs). | Quote-based |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://docs.devin.ai/work-with-devin/mcp | https://escape.tech/blog/introducing-cascade-the-multi-agent-penetration-testing/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://devin.ai/ | https://escape.tech/ |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 17 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 6 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
More Devin comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Devin
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Devin
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Devin
- Claude Code security review vs Devin
- Codacy AI Reviewer vs Devin