Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)

Vendor: Escape · HQ: France · Category: Code security · Security

Last verified 18 Oct 2026 · Added 18 Oct 2026 · 5 sources · How we verify

Visit official site (opens in new tab) Claim this listing

Vendor? Get your “Listed on Agent Index” badge

What it does

Escape combines attack surface management, business-logic-aware DAST and AI pentesting for APIs, web apps and external assets. Its Cascade engine is described as multi-agent penetration testing that reasons about the application, chains multi-step exploits and proves findings with a working exploit, screenshots and logs; it can also re-test bug bounty findings. The vendor says its agents discover, test and remediate within engineering workflows and lists a Wiz integration. The privacy policy names Escape Technologies SAS with France as the country of the company.

Frameworks

No framework tags verified yet.

Pricing (as published)

Quote-based

Tasks

appsecpen-test-managementattack-surface

Sources

1. escape.tech/blog/introducing-cascade-the-multi-agent-penetration-testing/ (primary)
2. escape.tech/
3. escape.tech/pricing
4. escape.tech/about
5. escape.tech/privacy

Last verified 18 Oct 2026. Framework tags indicate relevance, not certification; “vendor-claimed” items are as marketed by the vendor. Spotted an error? Submit a correction or email sales@heritageservices.online. See our methodology.

Use-case comparisons

• AI code security agents — 17 verified listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
• Agentic pentesting AI agents — 6 verified listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)

Compare Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) with

• Aikido AI AutoFix vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
• Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
• Checkmarx One Assist vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
• Claude Code security review vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
• Codacy AI Reviewer vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
• Cursor Bugbot vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
• Devin vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
• Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) vs Factory Droids
• Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
• Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) vs GitHub Copilot coding agent

Alternatives

• Aikido AI AutoFix — Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ.
• Amazon Q Developer security scanning — Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes.
• Checkmarx One Assist — Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel.
• Claude Code security review — Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments.
• Codacy AI Reviewer — Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes.
• Cursor Bugbot — Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes.

See all Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) alternatives →

Stay updated