Devin vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
Devin (Cognition) and Pixee (automated triage and fix) (Pixee) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Devin |  Pixee (automated triage and fix) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cognition | Pixee |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Business operations | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Cognition’s autonomous coding agent. Listed here only for documented Snyk MCP/CLI scanning and SonarQube/Snyk/Checkmarx IDE plugins — not as a dedicated security product. | Security 'harness' that triages SAST/SCA/DAST/secrets findings for exploitability, opens fix pull requests with the analysis attached, works inside coding agents, and builds design-stage threat models. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, appsec | appsec, remediation, sast, sca, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Self-serve plans on devin.ai/pricing: Free $0; Pro $20/month; Max $200/month; Teams $80/month minimum plus $40/month per full seat; Enterprise custom (ACUs). | Not published as list prices. Pixee describes outcome-based pricing per 'resolution' (each automated triage or fix action), not per developer; custom quote. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://docs.devin.ai/work-with-devin/mcp | https://www.pixee.ai/platform |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://devin.ai/ | https://www.pixee.ai/platform |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 17 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
More Devin comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Devin
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Devin
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Devin
- Claude Code security review vs Devin
- Codacy AI Reviewer vs Devin