Pixee (automated triage and fix)

Vendor: Pixee · HQ: United States · Category: Code security · Security

Last verified 18 Oct 2026 · Added 18 Oct 2026 · 4 sources · How we verify

Visit official site (opens in new tab) Claim this listing

Vendor? Get your “Listed on Agent Index” badge

What it does

Pixee's platform ingests findings from existing scanners (SAST, SCA, DAST and secrets), uses reachability analysis to show which can actually be exploited and opens pull requests that carry the triage verdict and the analysis behind each fix for reviewers. Exploit Chains combines findings across SAST and SCA into attack paths checked step by step in code, and Foresight turns design documents into a living threat model with drift detection. Pixee states it works inside customers' coding agents. Backlog and false-positive reduction figures are vendor-claimed (for example a MoneyGram case study). The About page says the team comes from Contrast Security; the terms name Pixee, Inc. under Delaware law. Pricing is outcome-based (per resolution) and quoted, not seat-based.

Frameworks

No framework tags verified yet.

Pricing (as published)

Not published as list prices. Pixee describes outcome-based pricing per 'resolution' (each automated triage or fix action), not per developer; custom quote.

Tasks

appsecremediationsastscavulnerability-management

Sources

1. pixee.ai/platform (primary)
2. pixee.ai/pricing
3. pixee.ai/about
4. pixee.ai/policies/terms-of-service

Last verified 18 Oct 2026. Framework tags indicate relevance, not certification; “vendor-claimed” items are as marketed by the vendor. Spotted an error? Submit a correction or email sales@heritageservices.online. See our methodology.

Use-case comparisons

• AI code security agents — 17 verified listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)

Compare Pixee (automated triage and fix) with

• Aikido AI AutoFix vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
• Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
• Checkmarx One Assist vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
• Claude Code security review vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
• Codacy AI Reviewer vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
• Cursor Bugbot vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
• Devin vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
• Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
• Factory Droids vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
• GitHub Copilot Autofix vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)

Alternatives

• Aikido AI AutoFix — Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ.
• Amazon Q Developer security scanning — Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes.
• Checkmarx One Assist — Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel.
• Claude Code security review — Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments.
• Codacy AI Reviewer — Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes.
• Cursor Bugbot — Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes.

See all Pixee (automated triage and fix) alternatives →

Stay updated