Intruder AI Pentesting vs SafeBase
Intruder AI Pentesting (Intruder) and SafeBase (Drata (acquired SafeBase)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only SafeBase is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Intruder AI Pentesting |  SafeBase |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Intruder | Drata (acquired SafeBase) |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security, Compliance, Business operations |
| Summary | On-demand, code-aware web-app pentesting by AI agents built by Intruder's CREST-certified testers, with audit-ready reports in hours and issue-level 'micro pentests' to triage scanner findings. | Trust Center and AI Questionnaire Assistance for customer security reviews, now part of Drata (SafeBase brand being unified into Drata). |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management | trust center, questionnaire automation |
| Pricing (as published) | AI web-app pentests start from $3,500 per test; the scanning platform has a free-forever plan and paid monthly/annual tiers (intruder.io/pricing). | Not verified |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.intruder.io/platform/ai-pentesting | https://drata.com/blog/announcing-new-drata-look |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-16 |
| Official site | https://www.intruder.io/platform/ai-pentesting | https://drata.com/safebase |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Intruder AI Pentesting or SafeBase. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) — Italian offensive-security platform whose agentic AI hacker continuously maps APIs and applications, chains API interactions to find exploitable flaws, and validates findings for remediation. · Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) pair comparison
- Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) — Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps.
- Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) — Portuguese autonomous pentesting platform: the Hackian agentic AI maps the attack surface, runs exploitation routines, chains attack paths and delivers proof-of-exploit with compliance-ready reports. · Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) pair comparison
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) — On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. · Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) pair comparison
- Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) — Autonomous pentesting platform that runs unlimited self-directed internal, external, cloud, Kubernetes and AD pentests, plans attack paths, guides remediation and re-tests to verify fixes. · Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 6 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
More Intruder AI Pentesting comparisons
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- CloudSEK AI Agents vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Conveyor vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Intruder AI Pentesting vs Cortex AgentiX (agents for Cortex Cloud, XSIAM and XDR)
- CrowdStrike Charlotte AI vs Intruder AI Pentesting