AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) (Swipergy (Swipergy GmbH)) and Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) (Equixly) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Swipergy (Swipergy GmbH) | Equixly |
| HQ | Germany · Europe | Italy · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | German continuous security-testing platform with an AI agent that signs in to the customer's application on its own, chooses follow-up checks and documents attack paths, with every tool run evidenced. Findings are grouped into remediation actions with owners, deadlines and Jira sync, and retests confirm fixes. Agentic red-team campaigns (recon, access, lateral and report agents led by human red teamers) are also offered for TIBER-EU and DORA TLPT style testing. | Italian offensive-security platform whose agentic AI hacker continuously maps APIs and applications, chains API interactions to find exploitable flaws, and validates findings for remediation. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | DORA TLPT, TIBER-EU | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, vulnerability management, remediation | pen test management, appsec, attack surface |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Penetration Test: €4,999 per test (results in 2 days, blackbox/greybox, full audit report). Continuous Equixly Platform: custom pricing (equixly.com/pricing). |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.aipentix.com/en/ | https://equixly.com/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aipentix.com/en/ | https://equixly.com/ |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 14 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) alternatives
- Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government)
More Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)