AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Intruder AI Pentesting
AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) (Swipergy (Swipergy GmbH)) and Intruder AI Pentesting (Intruder) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Swipergy (Swipergy GmbH) | Intruder |
| HQ | Germany · Europe | United Kingdom · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | German continuous security-testing platform with an AI agent that signs in to the customer's application on its own, chooses follow-up checks and documents attack paths, with every tool run evidenced. Findings are grouped into remediation actions with owners, deadlines and Jira sync, and retests confirm fixes. Agentic red-team campaigns (recon, access, lateral and report agents led by human red teamers) are also offered for TIBER-EU and DORA TLPT style testing. | On-demand, code-aware web-app pentesting by AI agents built by Intruder's CREST-certified testers, with audit-ready reports in hours and issue-level 'micro pentests' to triage scanner findings. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | DORA TLPT, TIBER-EU | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, vulnerability management, remediation | pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | AI web-app pentests start from $3,500 per test; the scanning platform has a free-forever plan and paid monthly/annual tiers (intruder.io/pricing). |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.aipentix.com/en/ | https://www.intruder.io/platform/ai-pentesting |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aipentix.com/en/ | https://www.intruder.io/platform/ai-pentesting |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 14 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) alternatives
- Intruder AI Pentesting alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government)
More Intruder AI Pentesting comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Intruder AI Pentesting