Devin vs depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting)
Devin (Cognition) and depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting) (depthfirst (DepthFirst AI, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Devin |  depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cognition | depthfirst (DepthFirst AI, Inc.) |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Business operations | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Cognition’s autonomous coding agent. Listed here only for documented Snyk MCP/CLI scanning and SonarQube/Snyk/Checkmarx IDE plugins — not as a dedicated security product. | San Francisco application-security platform whose autonomous AI agents trace business logic and data flows to find exploitable code vulnerabilities, check dependency reachability and secrets, review pull requests with proposed fixes, and run agentic pentests against running applications, re-running each attack after a fix merges to confirm it is closed. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | FedRAMP | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, appsec | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, pr review, remediation, pen test management |
| Pricing (as published) | Self-serve plans on devin.ai/pricing: Free $0; Pro $20/month; Max $200/month; Teams $80/month minimum plus $40/month per full seat; Enterprise custom (ACUs). | Not published |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://docs.devin.ai/work-with-devin/mcp | https://depthfirst.com/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://devin.ai/ | https://depthfirst.com/ |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 28 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 19 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Devin alternatives
- depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Devin comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Devin
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Devin
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Devin
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Devin
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Devin
More depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting)