Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) vs Tembo
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) and Tembo (Tembo Data Systems) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) |  Tembo |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Escape | Tembo Data Systems |
| HQ | France · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Business operations |
| Summary | Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps. | Agent orchestration platform (not a dedicated AppSec scanner) that opens auto-fix PRs from Snyk vulnerability scans and Sentry production errors. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, pen test management, attack surface | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Quote-based | Published on tembo.io/pricing: free trial; Pro $60/month ($60 usage allowance, up to 5 users); Max $200/month (up to 10 users); Enterprise custom. Usage allowance covers Tembo Gateway tokens and cloud VM compute; overages optional on paid plans. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://escape.tech/blog/introducing-cascade-the-multi-agent-penetration-testing/ | https://docs.tembo.io/integrations/snyk |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://escape.tech/ | https://www.tembo.io/ |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 17 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 6 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
More Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Claude Code security review vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Codacy AI Reviewer vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)