Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Qevlar AI
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) and Qevlar AI (Qevlar AI) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) |  Qevlar AI |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Hadrian | Qevlar AI |
| HQ | Netherlands · Europe | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security |
| Summary | On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. | Autonomous AI SOC platform that triages, enriches and investigates security alerts across SIEM/XDR, EDR and other tools and returns a documented verdict for analysts. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, MITRE ATT&CK | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec | security operations, alert triage, incident response, threat detection |
| Pricing (as published) | Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). | Not published |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://hadrian.io/products/nova | https://www.qevlar.com/faq |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://hadrian.io/products/nova | https://www.qevlar.com/ |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) or Qevlar AI. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) — Agentic SOC platform with configurable agents for alert triage, enrichment, investigation and remediation under analyst oversight; its government offering is FedRAMP High authorized. · Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) pair comparison
- Dropzone AI SOC Analyst — AI agents for the SOC: an AI SOC Analyst that investigates alerts end to end and shows its reasoning, plus an AI Threat Hunter and AI Threat Intel Analyst. · Dropzone AI SOC Analyst pair comparison
- Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) — Italian offensive-security platform whose agentic AI hacker continuously maps APIs and applications, chains API interactions to find exploitable flaws, and validates findings for remediation. · Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) pair comparison
- Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) — Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps.
- Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) — Portuguese autonomous pentesting platform: the Hackian agentic AI maps the attack surface, runs exploitation routines, chains attack paths and delivers proof-of-exploit with compliance-ready reports. · Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) pair comparison
- Exaforce Exabots (agentic SOC) — Four role-based AI agents (Detect, Triage, Investigate, Respond) on Exaforce's own security data platform, covering detection engineering, tier-3 triage, threat hunting and playbook-driven response with approval gates. · Exaforce Exabots (agentic SOC) pair comparison
- Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) — Autonomous pentesting platform that runs unlimited self-directed internal, external, cloud, Kubernetes and AD pentests, plans attack paths, guides remediation and re-tests to verify fixes. · Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) pair comparison
- Intruder AI Pentesting — On-demand, code-aware web-app pentesting by AI agents built by Intruder's CREST-certified testers, with audit-ready reports in hours and issue-level 'micro pentests' to triage scanner findings. · Intruder AI Pentesting pair comparison
- Sekoia Elevate (AI SOC agents) — Agentic AI SOC analyst inside the Sekoia SOC platform: agents autonomously investigate every alert and case, show their reasoning and produce audit-ready reports for analyst validation. · Sekoia Elevate (AI SOC agents) pair comparison
- Sophos MDR AI Agents (Triage and Case Investigation) — Sophos's managed detection and response service uses in-house AI agents for alert triage and case investigation, with Sophos analysts supervising and owning response decisions. · Sophos MDR AI Agents (Triage and Case Investigation) pair comparison
- Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) — Agentic SOC platform where the Socrates orchestrator plans and delegates to specialised HyperAgents for alert triage, investigation and response automation. · Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 10 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 6 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
More Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) comparisons
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Conveyor vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Mondoo
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Orca Security
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs SafeBase