Pixee (automated triage and fix) vs Tembo
Pixee (automated triage and fix) (Pixee) and Tembo (Tembo Data Systems) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Pixee | Tembo Data Systems |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Business operations |
| Summary | Security 'harness' that triages SAST/SCA/DAST/secrets findings for exploitability, opens fix pull requests with the analysis attached, works inside coding agents, and builds design-stage threat models. | Agent orchestration platform (not a dedicated AppSec scanner) that opens auto-fix PRs from Snyk vulnerability scans and Sentry production errors. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, sast, sca, vulnerability management | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published as list prices. Pixee describes outcome-based pricing per 'resolution' (each automated triage or fix action), not per developer; custom quote. | Published on tembo.io/pricing: free trial; Pro $60/month ($60 usage allowance, up to 5 users); Max $200/month (up to 10 users); Enterprise custom. Usage allowance covers Tembo Gateway tokens and cloud VM compute; overages optional on paid plans. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.pixee.ai/platform | https://docs.tembo.io/integrations/snyk |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.pixee.ai/platform | https://www.tembo.io/ |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 17 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
More Pixee (automated triage and fix) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
- Claude Code security review vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
- Codacy AI Reviewer vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)