Home / Agents / Qodo multi-agent code review

Qodo multi-agent code review

Name: Qodo multi-agent code review
Availability: OnlineOnly
Author: Qodo (Codium Ltd.)

Vendor: Qodo (Codium Ltd.) · HQ: Israel · Category: Code security

Last verified 18 Oct 2026 · Added 18 Oct 2026 · 5 sources · How we verify

Visit official site (opens in new tab) Claim this listing

Vendor? Get your “Listed on Agent Index” badge

What it does

Qodo (Codium Ltd., doing business as Qodo) sells an agentic PR review system for GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket and IDEs: multi-agent review that enforces organisational rules and standards, cross-repo breaking-change detection, pre-PR review skills and a self-learning rules system. Qodo's documentation lists security issues as one of the finding types tracked in its review analytics alongside bugs, rule violations and requirement gaps, so the security coverage is part of general code review rather than a dedicated AppSec scanner (same framing as other PR reviewers listed here). Qodo also offers an Agentic Toolbox that gives coding agents such as Codex, Claude and Kiro a CLI-based quality counterpart. The privacy policy gives Codium Ltd.'s address in Tel Aviv, Israel. Pricing is published.

Frameworks

No framework tags verified yet.

Pricing (as published)

Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page.

India relevance

PR review that flags security issues can support secure SDLC programmes. Qodo does not market a CERT-In module.

Tasks

pr-reviewappseccode-quality

Sources

Last verified 18 Oct 2026. Framework tags indicate relevance, not certification; “vendor-claimed” items are as marketed by the vendor. Spotted an error? Submit a correction or email sales@heritageservices.online. See our methodology.

Not legal or audit advice. Confirm current pricing, framework coverage and India-regulatory claims with the vendor before purchasing.

Use-case comparisons

AI code security agents — 17 verified listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)

Compare Qodo multi-agent code review with

Alternatives

Aikido AI AutoFix — Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ.
Amazon Q Developer security scanning — Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes.
Checkmarx One Assist — Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel.
Claude Code security review — Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments.
Codacy AI Reviewer — Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes.
Cursor Bugbot — Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes.

See all Qodo multi-agent code review alternatives →

Stay updated

We use your email only to send the newsletter. See our privacy policy.