Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
Vendor: Xygeni Security · HQ: Spain · Category: Code security · Security
Last verified · Added · 4 sources · How we verify
Visit official site (opens in new tab) Claim this listing
Vendor? Get your “Listed on Agent Index” badge
What it does
Xygeni's DevAI runs continuously in the IDE (VS Code, IntelliJ, Cursor, Windsurf), doing incremental SAST, secrets and supply-chain checks on human-written and AI-generated code, explaining attack paths and generating fixes for code, dependencies and secrets that are checked by Xygeni's MCP server for breaking-change and policy risk before developers apply them. CoreAI is described as a continuous intelligence layer that correlates findings from code to runtime, ranks them by exploitability, generates remediation plans and can open pull requests, apply guardrails and update configurations, with the Xyra interface for teams to review and approve actions. The wider platform covers SAST, SCA, secrets, CI/CD, IaC, DAST and ASPM. The legal notice names XYGENI SECURITY SL, Valladolid, Spain. A free plan is listed; paid plans are priced by contributors and scans.
Frameworks
No framework tags verified yet.
Pricing (as published)
Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page).
India relevance
Automated fixes for SAST/SCA/secrets findings can support CERT-In-oriented vulnerability handling. Xygeni does not market a CERT-In module.
Tasks
appsecsastscasecrets-detectionremediation
Sources
Last verified 18 Oct 2026. Framework tags indicate relevance, not certification; “vendor-claimed” items are as marketed by the vendor. Spotted an error? Submit a correction or email sales@heritageservices.online. See our methodology.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 17 verified listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Compare Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) with
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Claude Code security review vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Codacy AI Reviewer vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Cursor Bugbot vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Devin vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Factory Droids vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- GitHub Copilot Autofix vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
Alternatives
- Aikido AI AutoFix — Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ.
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning — Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes.
- Checkmarx One Assist — Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel.
- Claude Code security review — Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments.
- Codacy AI Reviewer — Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes.
- Cursor Bugbot — Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes.
See all Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) alternatives →
Stay updated
We use your email only to send the newsletter. See our privacy policy.