Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
Aikido Attack AI Pentesting (Aikido Security) and Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) (Ethiack) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Aikido Attack AI Pentesting |  Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | Ethiack |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | Portugal · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security |
| Summary | Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report. | Portuguese autonomous pentesting platform: the Hackian agentic AI maps the attack surface, runs exploitation routines, chains attack paths and delivers proof-of-exploit with compliance-ready reports. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, appsec, attack surface, vulnerability management | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: aikido.dev/pricing lists a free Developer tier and paid tiers that include monthly credits (for example 100 or 200 per month) usable for AI pentesting, plus a separate Pentest pricing tab. Check the vendor page for current amounts. | Published on ethiack.com/pricing: on-demand pentest €3,000 per test; Continuous 'Core' €9,000/year (shown as 25% off €12,000); Enterprise custom. Guarantee offer: free of charge unless a validated, proven-exploitable vulnerability is found. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/attack/aipentest | https://ethiack.com/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/attack/aipentest | https://ethiack.com/ |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Aikido Attack AI Pentesting or Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Synack Sara AI Pentesting — Synack's Autonomous Red Agent (Sara) for agentic pentesting, with exploitable findings validated by the Synack Red Team. · Synack Sara AI Pentesting pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 12 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting alternatives
- Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Aikido Attack AI Pentesting comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)
More Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)