Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness)
Aikido Attack AI Pentesting (Aikido Security) and Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness) (Keepnet Labs (Keepnet Labs Ltd.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Aikido Attack AI Pentesting |  Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | Keepnet Labs (Keepnet Labs Ltd.) |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | United Kingdom · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security |
| Summary | Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report. | Human risk management platform whose AI agent reviews user-reported emails, opens investigations and proposes next steps in Incident Responder, with every action held in a human approval queue; the same agent builds and runs phishing simulations and awareness training. Per-user pricing is published. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, appsec, attack surface, vulnerability management | phishing triage, email security, incident response, alert triage |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: aikido.dev/pricing lists a free Developer tier and paid tiers that include monthly credits (for example 100 or 200 per month) usable for AI pentesting, plus a separate Pentest pricing tab. Check the vendor page for current amounts. | Published per-user MSRP tiers on keepnetlabs.com/pricing (USD/EUR/GBP, by user band; e.g. Incident Responder bought alone is shown at about US$0.72–1.04 per user in the 25–1,000-user bands, and bundle plans from about US$1.40 to US$3.15 per user in the 25–500-user bands). Static capture: check the page for billing period and column mapping; 1,000+ users by quote. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/attack/aipentest | https://keepnetlabs.com/products/incident-responder |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/attack/aipentest | https://keepnetlabs.com/products/incident-responder |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Aikido Attack AI Pentesting or Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) — German continuous security-testing platform with an AI agent that signs in to the customer's application on its own, chooses follow-up checks and documents attack paths, with every tool run evidenced. Findings are grouped into remediation actions with owners, deadlines and Jira sync, and retests confirm fixes. Agentic red-team campaigns (recon, access, lateral and report agents led by human red teamers) are also offered for TIBER-EU and DORA TLPT style testing. · AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) pair comparison
- Doppel agentic social engineering defense (Email Security, Phishing Triage and agentic takedowns) — Social engineering defense platform where AI agents triage employee-reported phishing, remove malicious mail automatically, tune email detection policies and trace phishing back to its sending infrastructure and links to execute takedowns, alongside brand-impersonation takedowns across web, social, ads and app stores. · Doppel agentic social engineering defense (Email Security, Phishing Triage and agentic takedowns) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 15 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 14 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting alternatives
- Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Aikido Attack AI Pentesting comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government)
More Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness)