Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) (Endor Labs) and Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) |  Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Endor Labs | Escape |
| HQ | United States · North America | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Pre-built AppSec agents that read Endor findings against your source, write SAST fixes or file exceptions, pick safe dependency upgrades and open PRs, and answer malware-exposure and CI/CD posture questions inside your coding agents. | Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, remediation, vulnerability management | appsec, pen test management, attack surface |
| Pricing (as published) | Free Developer tier (AURI, no account required); Core and Pro tiers and add-on products are 'Get started' / 'Get pricing' with no list prices on endorlabs.com/pricing. | Quote-based |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.endorlabs.com/platform/agentic-workflows | https://escape.tech/blog/introducing-cascade-the-multi-agent-penetration-testing/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.endorlabs.com/platform/agentic-workflows | https://escape.tech/ |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) or Escape (AI pentesting and DAST). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) — AWS frontier agent (formerly AWS Security Agent) that runs on-demand penetration tests of your applications with tailored multi-step attack scenarios, reproducible proof and ready-to-implement fixes, billed per task-hour.
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) — Agentic AI application security tool (GA March 2026) with role- and task-based agents that analyse new code in any language, filter findings by exploitability and apply verified fixes, callable from Claude Code, Gemini and GitHub Copilot via MCP. · Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) pair comparison
- HCL AppScan RapidFix — Agentic AI triage and auto-fix for SAST findings in HCL AppScan: an LLM pass reviews each finding's accuracy and severity, filters false positives, and a deterministic codemod framework writes fixes in repos and pull requests. · HCL AppScan RapidFix pair comparison
- Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing — Continuous external pentesting in which Patrowl's AI agents correlate assets, threats and past evidence, choose the next test step every day, and route every finding through a certified pentester before it reaches you.
- RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) — AI offensive security platform whose agents run black- or white-box autonomous pentests, chain vulnerabilities across code, APIs, cloud and infrastructure, reproduce every finding, and re-test on each deployment.
- YesWeHack Agentic Pentest — On-demand pentests of external attack surface run by AI agents shaped by YesWeHack's bug-hunting expertise, with dedicated verification agents, a Pentest Manager, same-day results and reports in its vulnerability-management platform.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 20 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 10 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) alternatives
- Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
- Claude Code security review vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
More Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Claude Code security review vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)