episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) vs KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform)
episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) (episki (episki, llc)) and KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) (KaitoSec (KaitoSec GmbH)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) is tagged for ISO 27001, DORA.
| Field |  episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) |  KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | episki (episki, llc) | KaitoSec (KaitoSec GmbH) |
| HQ | United States · North America | Germany · Europe |
| Primary category | Compliance | Compliance |
| Also listed in | Compliance, Risk | Compliance, Risk |
| Summary | A GRC platform built around agents that draft policies, answer inbound security questionnaires, review vendors' SOC 2 and CAIQ responses, map controls, assess risks and write deterministic evidence-collection recipes. Every plan, step-run and sensitive action goes through human approvals and safety floors. Pricing is published. | German agentic GRC/ISMS platform whose agents import and map existing registers and documents, check them against the method (e.g. BSI IT-Grundschutz), turn gaps into owned tasks, propose risk ratings and controls, assign evidence, prepare audit answers and reassess risks when a record changes, with no change taking effect without human approval. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | ISO 27001, DORA |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, CMMC, HIPAA, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act | ISO 27001, BSI IT-Grundschutz, NIS2, DORA, SOC 2, TISAX, ISO 22301, ISO 42001, EU AI Act, GDPR |
| Capabilities / tasks | policy management, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, evidence collection, control mapping, risk assessment, trust center | gap analysis, control mapping, risk assessment, evidence collection, policy management |
| Pricing (as published) | Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited. | Not published |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://episki.com/product/ai | https://kaitosec.app/en/platform/ai-assistant |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://episki.com/product/ai | https://kaitosec.app/en/platform/ai-assistant |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) or KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Censinet Risk Assessor Agent (Assessor Agent for Supply Chain and Vendor Risk, Censinet GRC AI) — Healthcare third-party risk agent in Censinet RiskOps that reviews vendor questionnaire responses and supporting documents (such as SOC 2 and penetration-test reports), captures integration details from requests, identifies findings and drafts assessment reports and corrective action plans for the risk assessor to validate.
- Hybridity compliance execution platform agents (policy-to-control registry, scheduled evidence and batch contract checks) — Swedish compliance execution platform for regulated firms that turns a company's own policies into a requirement registry, checks it against DORA, NIS 2, GDPR or customer demands, and hands routine work to agents (contracts checked in batches, evidence collected on schedule, updates computed when a rule changes), with a person approving every result. · Hybridity compliance execution platform agents (policy-to-control registry, scheduled evidence and batch contract checks) pair comparison
- Levelpath Ranger (autonomous source-to-pay platform with AI agents) — Ranger is Levelpath's autonomous source-to-pay platform in which AI agents run sourcing events, generate RFPs and qualify suppliers, scan contract repositories and flag risks, continuously monitor operational and compliance signals across suppliers, and match invoices to orders and receipts, with configurable autonomy and logged actions.
- Point Predictive Predictor Agents (agentic forensic fraud reviews for lenders) — Specialist fraud agents for auto lenders, banks, credit unions and finance companies, launched Oct 16, 2026. They review consortium loan applications in real time for fraud rings and produce agentic forensic fraud reviews of loan files in seconds. Plain-language portfolio and dealer-risk questions run over Point Predictive's lending-fraud consortium.
- Procol Supplier Ops Agent (supplier onboarding, due-diligence and compliance, scoring and risk agents) — A coordinated set of procurement-side AI agents that run supplier onboarding from invite to approval. They validate tax IDs, licences and certificates, run continuous AML, sanctions and debarment screening, track contract expiry and compliance deviations with audit trails, and score suppliers on cost, quality, delivery and compliance.
- Rescana autonomous TPRM agents (Discovery & Classification, Risk Assessment, Communication & Remediation and Manager agents) — A third-party risk platform run by a coordinated team of AI agents. They discover and classify vendors from identity, procurement and IT systems, collect and analyse vendor documentation and questionnaires against external attack-surface intelligence, chase vendors for missing evidence and remediation, and orchestrate approvals with humans in control.
Use-case comparisons
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 33 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
Related
- episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) alternatives
- KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) alternatives
- Best compliance AI agents
More episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Archer Evolv AI Operators (Evolv Foundation and Evolv Workplace) vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Athereon LAiKA (AI agent for ISMS, risk and questionnaires) vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
More KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform)
- Egerie Jerry (agentic Cyber GRC platform) vs KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform)
- Fidureon compliance agents vs KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform)
- KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) vs Noru Agentic Compliance (GRC agents)
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform)