episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) vs Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents)

episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) (episki (episki, llc)) and Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents) (Mindlapse (Mindlapse SAS)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents) is tagged for DORA.

Columns

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents)
Vendor episki (episki, llc)Mindlapse (Mindlapse SAS)
HQ United States · North AmericaFrance · Europe
Primary category ComplianceCompliance
Also listed in Compliance, RiskCompliance, Risk
Summary A GRC platform built around agents that draft policies, answer inbound security questionnaires, review vendors' SOC 2 and CAIQ responses, map controls, assess risks and write deterministic evidence-collection recipes. Every plan, step-run and sensitive action goes through human approvals and safety floors. Pricing is published.French agentic Cyber-GRC operating system whose Ernest engine runs separate planner, collector, adjudicator and writer agents to verify every governance claim (from policies, control owners or vendors) against evidence, connector signals and a cyber knowledge graph, returning sourced verdicts with confidence that are re-checked continuously and accepted or rejected by a human.
Framework tags (Agent Index) —DORA
Frameworks (vendor-claimed) SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, CMMC, HIPAA, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI ActNIS2, DORA, EU Cyber Resilience Act, EU AI Act
Capabilities / tasks policy management, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, evidence collection, control mapping, risk assessment, trust centercontrol monitoring, evidence collection, control mapping, vendor risk, risk assessment
Pricing (as published) Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited.Not published
Pricing model published-tiersquote
Primary source https://episki.com/product/aihttps://www.mindlapse.ai/platform/ernest/
Last checked 2026-10-192026-10-19
Official site https://episki.com/product/aihttps://www.mindlapse.ai/platform/ernest/
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) or Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Use-case comparisons

Related

More episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) comparisons

More Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents) comparisons