Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) and Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) is tagged for FedRAMP.
| Field |  Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) |  Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Escape | Amazon Web Services |
| HQ | France · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security |
| Summary | Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps. | Agent platform with security integrations: AWS's agentic IDE and autonomous agent, with Kiro Powers for Snyk, Aikido, SonarQube and Sonatype scanning. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | FedRAMP |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | FedRAMP |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | — | AWS GovCloud (Kiro in scope) · FedRAMP Authorized · F1603047866 · High · authorized 2016-06-21 |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, pen test management, attack surface | agent platform with security integrations, appsec, pr review |
| Pricing (as published) | Quote-based | Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check). |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Primary source | https://escape.tech/blog/introducing-cascade-the-multi-agent-penetration-testing/ | https://kiro.dev/powers/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://escape.tech/ | https://kiro.dev/powers/ |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 23 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 12 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 19 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) alternatives
- Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Claude Code security review vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
More Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Claude Code security review vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)