GitHub Copilot coding agent vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
GitHub Copilot coding agent (GitHub) and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) (Xygeni Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  GitHub Copilot coding agent |  Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | GitHub | Xygeni Security |
| HQ | United States · North America | Spain · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Business operations | Code security, Security |
| Summary | GitHub Copilot’s coding agent. Listed here only for the official workflow that assigns Dependabot security alerts to Copilot (or other agents) to open a draft fix PR. | Agentic AppSec from Valladolid-based Xygeni: DevAI scans code in the IDE and generates validated fixes (including for AI-generated code), while CoreAI prioritises risk and orchestrates remediation PRs across the platform. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Requires a Copilot plan that includes coding agent (Copilot Pro is $10/month with included AI credits on github.com/features/copilot/plans) plus GitHub Code Security for assigning Dependabot alerts ($30 per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans; public repos differ). Coding-agent sessions consume GitHub AI credits. | Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page). |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://github.blog/changelog/2026-04-07-dependabot-alerts-are-now-assignable-to-ai-agents-for-remediation/ | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/coding-agent | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 17 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- GitHub Copilot coding agent alternatives
- Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More GitHub Copilot coding agent comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Checkmarx One Assist vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Claude Code security review vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Codacy AI Reviewer vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
More Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Claude Code security review vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Codacy AI Reviewer vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)