Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) (Phoenix Security) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Phoenix Security | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | UK AI code-security agent platform with reachability-validated scanning, PR scanning, IDE/agent integrations and an agent that writes risk-tiered fix PRs. | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, pr review, remediation | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published for Phoenix Purple specifically. The Phoenix pricing page lists platform plans (Free; Professional £1,495/month; Enterprise on request) but does not say which plan includes Purple. | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://phoenix.security/phoenix-purple_ai_code_security/ | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://phoenix.security/phoenix-purple_ai_code_security/ | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 25 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) alternatives
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security)
- Claude Code security review vs Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security)
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Claude Code security review vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)