ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)

Vendor: ZeroPath · HQ: United States · Category: Code security · Security

Last verified 18 Oct 2026 · Added 18 Oct 2026 · 5 sources · How we verify

Visit official site (opens in new tab) Claim this listing

Vendor? Get your “Listed on Agent Index” badge

What it does

ZeroPath describes itself as agentic AppSec covering code, dependencies, infrastructure and runtime. Its SAST Auto-Fix product uses AI to validate findings from existing scanners (Snyk, Semgrep, Checkmarx, SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify, Synopsys) to cut false positives, deduplicates them and generates working patches that developers can refine with natural-language PR comments before approval. The platform also offers AI-native SAST with business-logic and broken-auth detection, SCA with reachability, secrets and IaC scanning, DAST-style runtime validation, automated PR security reviews and automated threat modelling. Noise-reduction percentages are vendor-claimed. The privacy policy and terms give a San Francisco address. Team pricing is published.

Frameworks

No framework tags verified yet.

Pricing (as published)

Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%.

Tasks

appsecsastremediationpr-reviewsca

Sources

1. zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix (primary)
2. zeropath.com/
3. zeropath.com/pricing
4. zeropath.com/privacy
5. zeropath.com/terms

Last verified 18 Oct 2026. Framework tags indicate relevance, not certification; “vendor-claimed” items are as marketed by the vendor. Spotted an error? Submit a correction or email sales@heritageservices.online. See our methodology.

Use-case comparisons

• AI code security agents — 17 verified listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)

Compare ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) with

• Aikido AI AutoFix vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
• Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
• Checkmarx One Assist vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
• Claude Code security review vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
• Codacy AI Reviewer vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
• Cursor Bugbot vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
• Devin vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
• Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
• Factory Droids vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
• GitHub Copilot Autofix vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)

Alternatives

• Aikido AI AutoFix — Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ.
• Amazon Q Developer security scanning — Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes.
• Checkmarx One Assist — Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel.
• Claude Code security review — Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments.
• Codacy AI Reviewer — Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes.
• Cursor Bugbot — Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes.

See all ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) alternatives →

Stay updated