Claude Code security review vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
Claude Code security review (Anthropic) and ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) (ZeroPath) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Claude Code security review | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | ZeroPath |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments. | AI-native AppSec platform that finds business-logic and auth flaws, validates findings from existing SAST tools, runs PR security reviews and generates one-click patches refined in natural language. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, pr review, sast, vulnerability management | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key. | Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code | https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code | https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Claude Code security review or ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) — Italian offensive-security platform whose agentic AI hacker continuously maps APIs and applications, chains API interactions to find exploitable flaws, and validates findings for remediation.
- Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) — Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps. · Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) pair comparison
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) — On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management.
- Intruder AI Pentesting — On-demand, code-aware web-app pentesting by AI agents built by Intruder's CREST-certified testers, with audit-ready reports in hours and issue-level 'micro pentests' to triage scanner findings.
- Pixee (automated triage and fix) — Security 'harness' that triages SAST/SCA/DAST/secrets findings for exploitability, opens fix pull requests with the analysis attached, works inside coding agents, and builds design-stage threat models. · Pixee (automated triage and fix) pair comparison
- Qodo multi-agent code review — Agentic pull-request review platform (formerly CodiumAI) that flags bugs, security issues and rule violations with organisational context. A general code reviewer, not a dedicated SAST scanner. · Qodo multi-agent code review pair comparison
- Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) — Agentic AppSec from Valladolid-based Xygeni: DevAI scans code in the IDE and generates validated fixes (including for AI-generated code), while CoreAI prioritises risk and orchestrates remediation PRs across the platform. · Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 17 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Claude Code security review alternatives
- ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Claude Code security review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Claude Code security review
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Claude Code security review
- Claude Code security review vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Claude Code security review vs Cursor Bugbot
More ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Codacy AI Reviewer vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Cursor Bugbot vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)