Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
Aikido Attack AI Pentesting (Aikido Security) and Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Aikido Attack AI Pentesting |  Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | Hadrian |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | Netherlands · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report. | On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, MITRE ATT&CK |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, appsec, attack surface, vulnerability management | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: aikido.dev/pricing lists a free Developer tier and paid tiers that include monthly credits (for example 100 or 200 per month) usable for AI pentesting, plus a separate Pentest pricing tab. Check the vendor page for current amounts. | Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/attack/aipentest | https://hadrian.io/products/nova |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/attack/aipentest | https://hadrian.io/products/nova |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Aikido Attack AI Pentesting or Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) — Cycode's AppSec AI agents that assess the exploitability of findings, generate fixes, analyse change impact and query the risk graph inside the Cycode platform.
- Kalpita CodeGuard — Indian autonomous DevSecOps agent that scans each commit, generates a secure patch and opens a human-approved pull request.
- Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) — UK AI code-security agent platform with reachability-validated scanning, PR scanning, IDE/agent integrations and an agent that writes risk-tiered fix PRs.
- Synack Sara AI Pentesting — Synack's Autonomous Red Agent (Sara) for agentic pentesting, with exploitable findings validated by the Synack Red Team. · Synack Sara AI Pentesting pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 12 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting alternatives
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Aikido Attack AI Pentesting comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)