Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Lumos Albus (identity governance agent)
Aikido Attack AI Pentesting (Aikido Security) and Lumos Albus (identity governance agent) (Lumos) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | Lumos |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security, Compliance |
| Summary | Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report. | AI agent built into the Lumos identity governance platform that designs roles, completes access reviews (approve/flag with peer and usage analysis) and investigates identity risk, explaining every decision. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, appsec, attack surface, vulnerability management | identity governance, access reviews, risk assessment |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: aikido.dev/pricing lists a free Developer tier and paid tiers that include monthly credits (for example 100 or 200 per month) usable for AI pentesting, plus a separate Pentest pricing tab. Check the vendor page for current amounts. | Not published |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/attack/aipentest | https://www.lumos.com/products/albus |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/attack/aipentest | https://www.lumos.com/products/albus |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Aikido Attack AI Pentesting or Lumos Albus (identity governance agent). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Opal Paladin — AI identity agent in Opal that reviews access requests, investigates context and approves, denies or escalates with recorded reasoning. · Opal Paladin pair comparison
- Synack Sara AI Pentesting — Synack's Autonomous Red Agent (Sara) for agentic pentesting, with exploitable findings validated by the Synack Red Team. · Synack Sara AI Pentesting pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 12 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 3 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting alternatives
- Lumos Albus (identity governance agent) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Aikido Attack AI Pentesting comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)
More Lumos Albus (identity governance agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Lumos Albus (identity governance agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Lumos Albus (identity governance agent)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Lumos Albus (identity governance agent)
- Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) vs Lumos Albus (identity governance agent)
- AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) vs Lumos Albus (identity governance agent)