Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) (Attic Security) and RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) (RunSybil) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Attic Security | RunSybil |
| HQ | Netherlands · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | Dutch AI SOC agent for Microsoft 365 SMBs that triages, investigates and contains identity alerts across Defender, Sentinel and Entra ID with human sign-off. | AI offensive security platform whose agents run black- or white-box autonomous pentests, chain vulnerabilities across code, APIs, cloud and infrastructure, reproduce every finding, and re-test on each deployment. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | security operations, alert triage, incident response, threat detection, remediation | pen test management, attack surface, appsec, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: the agentic MDR page lists €6 per user per month, decreasing with more users. The pricing page lists plans from €27/month on annual billing, with incident-handling add-ons (+2x IVON incident handling from €30.15, +5x from €34.20). Prices exclude VAT. Check the pricing page for current amounts. | Not published |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://atticsecurity.com/en/agentic-mdr/ | https://www.runsybil.com/solutions/autonomous-penetration-testing |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://atticsecurity.com/en/agentic-mdr/ | https://www.runsybil.com/solutions/autonomous-penetration-testing |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) or RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting — Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report. · Aikido Attack AI Pentesting pair comparison
- Datadog Bits AI Security Analyst — AI agent in Datadog Cloud SIEM that autonomously investigates security signals and returns evidence-backed Benign or Suspicious verdicts. · Datadog Bits AI Security Analyst pair comparison
- Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent — AI agent in Google Security Operations that autonomously investigates SIEM alerts and returns a verdict, confidence score, timeline and next steps. · Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent pair comparison
- Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent (Defender) — Security Copilot agent in Microsoft Defender that autonomously triages user-reported phishing, resolves false positives and explains each verdict. · Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent (Defender) pair comparison
- Reliance Cyber RADAR — UK agentic MDR platform on Google Security Operations with specialist AI agents for detection engineering, triage, response and self-healing, under human oversight. · Reliance Cyber RADAR pair comparison
- Synack Sara AI Pentesting — Synack's Autonomous Red Agent (Sara) for agentic pentesting, with exploitable findings validated by the Synack Red Team. · Synack Sara AI Pentesting pair comparison
- WedgeX AI SOC Agent — Australian AI SOC agent that enriches, investigates and recommends escalate/close actions on alerts, proposing containment for human approval. · WedgeX AI SOC Agent pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 26 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 12 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) alternatives
- RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365)
- Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)
More RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
- AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)