AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) vs Opal Paladin
AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) (Amazon Web Services) and Opal Paladin (Opal Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) |  Opal Paladin |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Amazon Web Services | Opal Security |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security |
| Summary | AWS frontier agent (formerly AWS Security Agent) that runs on-demand penetration tests of your applications with tailored multi-step attack scenarios, reproducible proof and ready-to-implement fixes, billed per task-hour. | AI identity agent in Opal that reviews access requests, investigates context and approves, denies or escalates with recorded reasoning. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management, remediation | identity governance, access reviews |
| Pricing (as published) | $50.00 per task-hour (metered per second; concurrent tasks add up, so billable task-hours usually exceed wall-clock time). First three revalidations per finding are free; a free trial is offered (aws.amazon.com/continuum/pricing). | Not published for Paladin. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://aws.amazon.com/continuum/ | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://aws.amazon.com/continuum/ | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) or Opal Paladin. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting — Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report. · Aikido Attack AI Pentesting pair comparison
- Synack Sara AI Pentesting — Synack's Autonomous Red Agent (Sara) for agentic pentesting, with exploitable findings validated by the Synack Red Team. · Synack Sara AI Pentesting pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 12 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 3 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) alternatives
- Opal Paladin alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)
- Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)