Home / Compare / Drata vs Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents)

Drata vs Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents)

Drata (Drata) and Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents) (Mindlapse (Mindlapse SAS)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Drata is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, FedRAMP, CMMC.

Field	Drata	Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents)
Vendor	Drata	Mindlapse (Mindlapse SAS)
HQ	United States · North America	France · Europe
Primary category	Compliance	Compliance
Also listed in	Compliance, Risk	Compliance, Risk
Summary	Compliance and trust management platform with AI-assisted evidence collection, continuous control monitoring, and multi-framework programs.	French agentic Cyber-GRC operating system whose Ernest engine runs separate planner, collector, adjudicator and writer agents to verify every governance claim (from policies, control owners or vendors) against evidence, connector signals and a cyber knowledge graph, returning sourced verdicts with confidence that are re-checked continuously and accepted or rejected by a human.
Framework tags (Agent Index)	SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, FedRAMP, CMMC	—
FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope)	Drata Trust Management Platform · FedRAMP Authorized · FR2600167032 · 20x Low · authorized 2025-12-05	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, NIST, CMMC, EU Cyber Resilience Act, AIUC-1	NIS2, DORA, EU Cyber Resilience Act, EU AI Act
Capabilities / tasks	evidence collection, control monitoring, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, trust center	control monitoring, evidence collection, control mapping, vendor risk, risk assessment
Pricing (as published)	Quote-based. AWS Marketplace Foundation Package listed at $15,000/year for 1–50 employees (third-party census of marketplace listing).	Not published
Pricing model	annual-contract	quote
Primary source	https://drata.com/	https://www.mindlapse.ai/platform/ernest/
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-19
Official site	https://drata.com/	https://www.mindlapse.ai/platform/ernest/

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Drata or Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Auditoria AI agents (AP Helpdesk, AP Invoices, AP Accruals, AP Vendor Watch, AP Statement Reconciliation, AR Collections, AR Remittances) — AI agents that run accounts payable and receivable work inside finance's own ERP and inboxes: they answer vendor emails, capture and code invoices, chase accruals, monitor supplier bank, tax ID and sanctions data, reconcile vendor statements, and run collections and remittance matching within policy guardrails.
C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) — Governed AI agent on C1's identity platform that carries out identity work end to end from a plain-language request (revoking stale admin grants, building access reviews, assembling audit evidence on who reached production, finding orphaned entitlement owners), acting only within the operator's own permissions and logging every action.
CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) — Agentic investigation tool built on Thomson Reuters CLEAR public-records data. From a plain-language question it plans and runs searches across CLEAR data and the open web, resolves conflicting records and returns concise cited findings with a record of the searches it ran, for AML, fraud, program-integrity and law-enforcement investigators.
CleverChain AI agents (VERA autonomous due diligence and LUMA screening) — KYB, KYC, AML and third-party due-diligence platform where the VERA agent runs end-to-end investigations (ownership chain, business activity, sanctions and adverse media) into a cited, policy-mapped report, and LUMA handles AML screening and ongoing monitoring, with analysts approving high-risk decisions.
Data Adhikaar DPDPA agents (ten-agent compliance fabric) — India DPDP Act compliance platform run by ten scoped agents for data discovery and RoPA, consent, data principal rights requests, breach response, DPIAs, regulatory intelligence, policy drafting, processor risk and audit evidence, with human approval gates for Board notifications, policy publication and severity downgrades.
KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) — German agentic GRC/ISMS platform whose agents import and map existing registers and documents, check them against the method (e.g. BSI IT-Grundschutz), turn gaps into owned tasks, propose risk ratings and controls, assign evidence, prepare audit answers and reassess risks when a record changes, with no change taking effect without human approval. · KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) pair comparison
noze DataGovern (on-premise compliance agents for NIS2, GDPR and the AI Act) — Italian on-premise platform whose AI agents read company documents and procedures, map them to NIS2, GDPR, AI Act, CRA and DORA obligations, flag gaps and risks with the source linked, and pre-fill registers, evidence and one remediation plan; a person approves every proposal and each confirmed gap becomes an owned task. · noze DataGovern (on-premise compliance agents for NIS2, GDPR and the AI Act) pair comparison
Optivalue.ai questionnaire agents (security questionnaires, TISAX and third-party collection) — French platform whose agents answer incoming security questionnaires, TISAX catalogues, DDQs and tenders from the customer's own evidence with document, page and version on every answer, score and gap-check the result and draft missing documents with the team before named sign-off, while its Reach product sends questionnaires to suppliers and chases non-responders automatically.
RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) — AI workforce of five lead agents and 27 specialists that runs third-party risk end to end: vendor outreach, onboarding and questionnaire chasing, document assessment, outside-in breach and score monitoring, regulatory gap analysis and remediation, and regulator-ready reporting, with Manual, Assisted or Autonomous mode set per vendor.
Vulcan Justinian (AI agent for government legal, regulatory and permitting work; VulcanGov) — AI agent for US government knowledge workers, grounded in a large corpus of federal and state statutes, regulations, court cases and fiscal data. It runs 50-state research in parallel with citations, monitors legal changes, reviews permit applications against the code, drafts memos and comment responses, and builds internal tools inside the agency boundary. · Vulcan Justinian (AI agent for government legal, regulatory and permitting work; VulcanGov) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 24 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)

Drata vs Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents)

Also in this use case

Use-case comparisons

Related

More Drata comparisons

More Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents) comparisons