GitHub Copilot coding agent vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
GitHub Copilot coding agent (GitHub) and Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) is tagged for FedRAMP.
| Field |  GitHub Copilot coding agent |  Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | GitHub | Amazon Web Services |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Business operations | Code security |
| Summary | GitHub Copilot’s coding agent. Listed here only for the official workflow that assigns Dependabot security alerts to Copilot (or other agents) to open a draft fix PR. | Agent platform with security integrations: AWS's agentic IDE and autonomous agent, with Kiro Powers for Snyk, Aikido, SonarQube and Sonatype scanning. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | FedRAMP |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | FedRAMP |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | — | AWS GovCloud (Kiro in scope) · FedRAMP Authorized · F1603047866 · High · authorized 2016-06-21 |
| Capabilities / tasks | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca | agent platform with security integrations, appsec, pr review |
| Pricing (as published) | Requires a Copilot plan that includes coding agent (Copilot Pro is $10/month with included AI credits on github.com/features/copilot/plans) plus GitHub Code Security for assigning Dependabot alerts ($30 per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans; public repos differ). Coding-agent sessions consume GitHub AI credits. | Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check). |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://github.blog/changelog/2026-04-07-dependabot-alerts-are-now-assignable-to-ai-agents-for-remediation/ | https://kiro.dev/powers/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/coding-agent | https://kiro.dev/powers/ |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 19 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- GitHub Copilot coding agent alternatives
- Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More GitHub Copilot coding agent comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Checkmarx One Assist vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Claude Code security review vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
More Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Claude Code security review vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)