Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) and Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) (Maze) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) |  Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Hadrian | Maze |
| HQ | Netherlands · Europe | United Kingdom · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. | UK AI agents that investigate every cloud and code vulnerability with code-to-cloud context, decide exploitability and deliver fixes. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, MITRE ATT&CK | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec | cloud security, vulnerability management, remediation, sca, sast |
| Pricing (as published) | Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). | Not published. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://hadrian.io/products/nova | https://mazehq.com/platform/cloud |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://hadrian.io/products/nova | https://mazehq.com/platform/cloud |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) or Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting — Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report. · Aikido Attack AI Pentesting pair comparison
- Synack Sara AI Pentesting — Synack's Autonomous Red Agent (Sara) for agentic pentesting, with exploitable findings validated by the Synack Red Team. · Synack Sara AI Pentesting pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 12 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Cloud security (CNAPP) AI agents — 7 listings (Cloud and container security posture, exposure and remediation)
Related
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) alternatives
- Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) comparisons
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Conveyor vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Mondoo
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Orca Security
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs SafeBase
More Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)