RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) vs Unit21 AI Agents for fraud and AML
RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) (RiskXchange) and Unit21 AI Agents for fraud and AML (Unit21) are both listed in the Risk category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) |  Unit21 AI Agents for fraud and AML |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | RiskXchange | Unit21 |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Risk | Risk |
| Also listed in | Risk, Security | Risk, Compliance |
| Summary | AI workforce of five lead agents and 27 specialists that runs third-party risk end to end: vendor outreach, onboarding and questionnaire chasing, document assessment, outside-in breach and score monitoring, regulatory gap analysis and remediation, and regulator-ready reporting, with Manual, Assisted or Autonomous mode set per vendor. | AI agents that run fraud and AML alert triage and investigations: they pull transaction history, check watchlists, run open-source research, assemble evidence, draft narratives and recommend dispositions for analyst approval. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | DORA, NIS2, ISO 27001, APRA CPS 230, NIST CSF, Cyber Essentials Plus, SOC 2 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | vendor risk, questionnaire automation, risk assessment, remediation, security ratings | aml, fraud detection, case investigation, sar narratives |
| Pricing (as published) | Platform tiers published: Essentials GBP 14,900/year (50 vendors), Professional GBP 31,500/year (150 vendors), Enterprise from GBP 75,000/year; unlimited seats, no setup fee. The pages don't say which tiers include The Agency. | Not published |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.riskxchange.co/agency | https://www.unit21.ai/products/ai-agent |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.riskxchange.co/agency | https://www.unit21.ai/products/ai-agent |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) or Unit21 AI Agents for fraud and AML. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) — KYC/KYB and compliance platform whose AI agents review AML screening hits (sanctions, PEP, adverse media) and recommend a decision under the customer's AML policy, check business websites for legitimacy and risk with ongoing monitoring, and review documents, with an analyst confirming the outcome. · AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) pair comparison
- CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) — Agentic investigation tool built on Thomson Reuters CLEAR public-records data. From a plain-language question it plans and runs searches across CLEAR data and the open web, resolves conflicting records and returns concise cited findings with a record of the searches it ran, for AML, fraud, program-integrity and law-enforcement investigators. · CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) pair comparison
- CleverChain AI agents (VERA autonomous due diligence and LUMA screening) — KYB, KYC, AML and third-party due-diligence platform where the VERA agent runs end-to-end investigations (ownership chain, business activity, sanctions and adverse media) into a cited, policy-mapped report, and LUMA handles AML screening and ongoing monitoring, with analysts approving high-risk decisions. · CleverChain AI agents (VERA autonomous due diligence and LUMA screening) pair comparison
- Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) — German agent that completes incoming security questionnaires (vendor assessments, TISAX, ISO 27001, DORA) in Excel, PDF, Word or vendor portals from the customer's policies, certificates and past answers, with a source citation on every answer, consistent answers to re-worded questions, expert routing and team approval.
- Genpact Transaction Monitoring Analyst (Banking Analyst Suite) — Generally available agentic AML module for banks: a central orchestrator coordinates specialised agents that gather data, analyse transactions and customer behaviour, review prior alerts and deliver a decision-ready Level 1 alert recommendation with documented rationale, with analysts making every final decision. · Genpact Transaction Monitoring Analyst (Banking Analyst Suite) pair comparison
- Optivalue.ai questionnaire agents (security questionnaires, TISAX and third-party collection) — French platform whose agents answer incoming security questionnaires, TISAX catalogues, DDQs and tenders from the customer's own evidence with document, page and version on every answer, score and gap-check the result and draft missing documents with the team before named sign-off, while its Reach product sends questionnaires to suppliers and chases non-responders automatically.
- Oscilar Agent Hub (AML, sanctions, fraud and onboarding agents) — Risk-decisioning platform with 30+ orchestrated agents on a shared risk memory, including AML L1 review, sanctions screening dispositions, adverse media, EDD dossier, SAR narrative, fraud L1 review, fraud-network and KYB review agents, where every recommendation is confirmed by a human analyst. · Oscilar Agent Hub (AML, sanctions, fraud and onboarding agents) pair comparison
- VAAS AI risk agents (KYC/KYB, AML and onboarding risk decisions) — Brazilian risk and compliance decisioning platform whose AI agents read the full KYC/KYB dossier, compare it with current regulation, flag risks such as adverse-media homonyms, and suggest a justified decision with a confidence level for the analyst to validate, with continuous re-analysis when a monitored person or company changes. · VAAS AI risk agents (KYC/KYB, AML and onboarding risk decisions) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AML and transaction-monitoring AI agents — 32 listings (Anti-money-laundering, transaction monitoring and financial-crime investigation)
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 23 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
- Security questionnaire AI agents — 7 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)
Related
- RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) alternatives
- Unit21 AI Agents for fraud and AML alternatives
- Best risk AI agents
More RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) comparisons
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) vs RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk)
- BigID vs RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk)
- Black Kite AI Agent vs RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk)
- Bretton AI agentic back-office platform (formerly Greenlite AI) vs RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk)
- Castellum.AI Arbiter AI agents (alert resolution, transaction and fraud monitoring agents) vs RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk)
More Unit21 AI Agents for fraud and AML comparisons
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) vs Unit21 AI Agents for fraud and AML
- BigID vs Unit21 AI Agents for fraud and AML
- Black Kite AI Agent vs Unit21 AI Agents for fraud and AML
- Bretton AI agentic back-office platform (formerly Greenlite AI) vs Unit21 AI Agents for fraud and AML
- Castellum.AI Arbiter AI agents (alert resolution, transaction and fraud monitoring agents) vs Unit21 AI Agents for fraud and AML