StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) (Xygeni Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) |  Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) | Xygeni Security |
| HQ | United States · North America | Spain · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. | Agentic AppSec from Valladolid-based Xygeni: DevAI scans code in the IDE and generates validated fixes (including for AI-generated code), while CoreAI prioritises risk and orchestrates remediation PRs across the platform. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. | Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | freemium |
| Primary source | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 25 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Claude Code security review vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
More Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Claude Code security review vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)