Aikido AI AutoFix vs Kalpita CodeGuard
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and Kalpita CodeGuard (Kalpita Technologies) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Aikido AI AutoFix | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | Kalpita Technologies |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | India · India |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ. | Indian autonomous DevSecOps agent that scans each commit, generates a secure patch and opens a human-approved pull request. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, sast, vulnerability management, iac | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, secrets detection, iac |
| Pricing (as published) | Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. | Not published (demo request). |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://www.kalpitatechnologies.com/products/kalpita-codeguard |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://www.kalpitatechnologies.com/products/kalpita-codeguard |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Aikido AI AutoFix or Kalpita CodeGuard. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting — Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report.
- Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) — Dutch AI SOC agent for Microsoft 365 SMBs that triages, investigates and contains identity alerts across Defender, Sentinel and Entra ID with human sign-off.
- Cav Compliance OS agents (formerly Caveonix) — Agentic cyber assurance and continuous compliance platform whose AI agents collect evidence, test controls, find gaps against 50+ frameworks (FISMA, NIST 800-53, FedRAMP, CMMC) and generate ATO artifacts; the platform is FedRAMP High authorized.
- Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) — Cycode's AppSec AI agents that assess the exploitability of findings, generate fixes, analyse change impact and query the risk graph inside the Cycode platform. · Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) pair comparison
- Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) — UK AI agents that investigate every cloud and code vulnerability with code-to-cloud context, decide exploitability and deliver fixes.
- Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) — UK AI code-security agent platform with reachability-validated scanning, PR scanning, IDE/agent integrations and an agent that writes risk-tiered fix PRs. · Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 23 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
More Aikido AI AutoFix comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Codacy AI Reviewer