Claude Code security review vs Kalpita CodeGuard
Claude Code security review (Anthropic) and Kalpita CodeGuard (Kalpita Technologies) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Claude Code security review | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | Kalpita Technologies |
| HQ | United States · North America | India · India |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments. | Indian autonomous DevSecOps agent that scans each commit, generates a secure patch and opens a human-approved pull request. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, pr review, sast, vulnerability management | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, secrets detection, iac |
| Pricing (as published) | Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key. | Not published (demo request). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code | https://www.kalpitatechnologies.com/products/kalpita-codeguard |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code | https://www.kalpitatechnologies.com/products/kalpita-codeguard |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Claude Code security review or Kalpita CodeGuard. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting — Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report.
- Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) — Cycode's AppSec AI agents that assess the exploitability of findings, generate fixes, analyse change impact and query the risk graph inside the Cycode platform. · Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) pair comparison
- Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) — UK AI agents that investigate every cloud and code vulnerability with code-to-cloud context, decide exploitability and deliver fixes.
- Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) — UK AI code-security agent platform with reachability-validated scanning, PR scanning, IDE/agent integrations and an agent that writes risk-tiered fix PRs. · Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 23 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
More Claude Code security review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Claude Code security review
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Claude Code security review
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Claude Code security review
- Claude Code security review vs Codacy AI Reviewer