Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) vs Opal Paladin
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) (Ethiack) and Opal Paladin (Opal Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) |  Opal Paladin |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Ethiack | Opal Security |
| HQ | Portugal · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Portuguese autonomous pentesting platform: the Hackian agentic AI maps the attack surface, runs exploitation routines, chains attack paths and delivers proof-of-exploit with compliance-ready reports. | AI identity agent in Opal that reviews access requests, investigates context and approves, denies or escalates with recorded reasoning. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management | identity governance, access reviews |
| Pricing (as published) | Published on ethiack.com/pricing: on-demand pentest €3,000 per test; Continuous 'Core' €9,000/year (shown as 25% off €12,000); Enterprise custom. Guarantee offer: free of charge unless a validated, proven-exploitable vulnerability is found. | Not published for Paladin. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://ethiack.com/ | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://ethiack.com/ | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) or Opal Paladin. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting — Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report. · Aikido Attack AI Pentesting pair comparison
- Synack Sara AI Pentesting — Synack's Autonomous Red Agent (Sara) for agentic pentesting, with exploitable findings validated by the Synack Red Team. · Synack Sara AI Pentesting pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 12 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 3 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) alternatives
- Opal Paladin alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)