GitHub Copilot coding agent vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
GitHub Copilot coding agent (GitHub) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | GitHub | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Business operations | Code security, Security |
| Summary | GitHub Copilot’s coding agent. Listed here only for the official workflow that assigns Dependabot security alerts to Copilot (or other agents) to open a draft fix PR. | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations |
| Pricing (as published) | Requires a Copilot plan that includes coding agent (Copilot Pro is $10/month with included AI credits on github.com/features/copilot/plans) plus GitHub Code Security for assigning Dependabot alerts ($30 per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans; public repos differ). Coding-agent sessions consume GitHub AI credits. | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. |
| Pricing model | freemium | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://github.blog/changelog/2026-04-07-dependabot-alerts-are-now-assignable-to-ai-agents-for-remediation/ | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/coding-agent | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 25 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- GitHub Copilot coding agent alternatives
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More GitHub Copilot coding agent comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Checkmarx One Assist vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Claude Code security review vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Claude Code security review vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)