Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Opal Paladin
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) and Opal Paladin (Opal Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) |  Opal Paladin |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Hadrian | Opal Security |
| HQ | Netherlands · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security |
| Summary | On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. | AI identity agent in Opal that reviews access requests, investigates context and approves, denies or escalates with recorded reasoning. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, MITRE ATT&CK | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec | identity governance, access reviews |
| Pricing (as published) | Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). | Not published for Paladin. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://hadrian.io/products/nova | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://hadrian.io/products/nova | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) or Opal Paladin. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting — Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report. · Aikido Attack AI Pentesting pair comparison
- Synack Sara AI Pentesting — Synack's Autonomous Red Agent (Sara) for agentic pentesting, with exploitable findings validated by the Synack Red Team. · Synack Sara AI Pentesting pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 12 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 3 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
More Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) comparisons
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Conveyor vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Mondoo
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Orca Security
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs SafeBase