Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) vs Snyk
Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) (Horizon3.ai) and Snyk (Snyk) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Snyk is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) |  Snyk |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Horizon3.ai | Snyk |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | Autonomous pentesting platform that runs unlimited self-directed internal, external, cloud, Kubernetes and AD pentests, plans attack paths, guides remediation and re-tests to verify fixes. | Developer-first application security platform; Snyk Agent Fix (formerly DeepCode AI Fix) generates and validates AI-suggested remediations for Snyk Code findings. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | FedRAMP | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, vulnerability management | vulnerability management, appsec, remediation, sast |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Published plans on snyk.io/plans (Free / Team / Enterprise style tiers; verify current amounts on the plans page). |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Primary source | https://horizon3.ai/nodezero/ | https://snyk.io/plans/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://horizon3.ai/nodezero/ | https://snyk.io/ |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) or Snyk. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) — Italian offensive-security platform whose agentic AI hacker continuously maps APIs and applications, chains API interactions to find exploitable flaws, and validates findings for remediation. · Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) pair comparison
- Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) — Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps.
- Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) — Portuguese autonomous pentesting platform: the Hackian agentic AI maps the attack surface, runs exploitation routines, chains attack paths and delivers proof-of-exploit with compliance-ready reports. · Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) pair comparison
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) — On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. · Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) pair comparison
- Intruder AI Pentesting — On-demand, code-aware web-app pentesting by AI agents built by Intruder's CREST-certified testers, with audit-ready reports in hours and issue-level 'micro pentests' to triage scanner findings. · Intruder AI Pentesting pair comparison
- Pixee (automated triage and fix) — Security 'harness' that triages SAST/SCA/DAST/secrets findings for exploitability, opens fix pull requests with the analysis attached, works inside coding agents, and builds design-stage threat models.
- Plerion Pleri (AI security engineer) — Sydney-based cloud and AI security platform with Pleri, an agent that investigates findings, checks real exploitability, raises fix PRs and Jira tickets, and follows each change through to merge. · Plerion Pleri (AI security engineer) pair comparison
- Qodo multi-agent code review — Agentic pull-request review platform (formerly CodiumAI) that flags bugs, security issues and rule violations with organisational context. A general code reviewer, not a dedicated SAST scanner.
- Sysdig Agentic AI (Sysdig Secure AI agents) — Outcome-driven AI agents inside Sysdig Secure for cloud and container security: Vuln, SOC, Posture, Risk and Response agents that investigate, prioritise and drive remediation on Falco-based runtime data. · Sysdig Agentic AI (Sysdig Secure AI agents) pair comparison
- Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) — Agentic AppSec from Valladolid-based Xygeni: DevAI scans code in the IDE and generates validated fixes (including for AI-generated code), while CoreAI prioritises risk and orchestrates remediation PRs across the platform.
- ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) — AI-native AppSec platform that finds business-logic and auth flaws, validates findings from existing SAST tools, runs PR security reviews and generates one-click patches refined in natural language.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 17 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 6 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
More Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) comparisons
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting)
- CloudSEK AI Agents vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting)
- Conveyor vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting)
- Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) vs Cortex AgentiX (agents for Cortex Cloud, XSIAM and XDR)
- CrowdStrike Charlotte AI vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting)