Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) (Hoxhunt) and Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) (Maze) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) |  Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Hoxhunt | Maze |
| HQ | Finland · Europe | United Kingdom · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | Finnish human-risk platform whose Respond module automatically investigates every employee-reported email, groups related reports into one campaign incident, suppresses safe and duplicate reports, and removes confirmed malicious messages from all affected inboxes without waiting for an analyst. | UK AI agents that investigate every cloud and code vulnerability with code-to-cloud context, decide exploitability and deliver fixes. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | phishing triage, email security, incident response, remediation | cloud security, vulnerability management, remediation, sca, sast |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (per-employee quote after a scoping call) | Not published. |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-email-incident-response-automation | https://mazehq.com/platform/cloud |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-email-incident-response-automation | https://mazehq.com/platform/cloud |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) or Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage — API-based 'agentic email security' that re-analyses inbound mail after native filtering with ML and LLM reasoning and removes confirmed threats across every inbox automatically (configurable human-in-the-loop thresholds). AI Phish Triage classifies employee-reported emails and acts on them, feeding Adaptive's simulations and awareness training. · Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage pair comparison
- Check Point Email Security AI agents (Harmony Email & Collaboration, formerly Avanan) — Check Point's API-based, prevention-first email and collaboration security (Harmony Email & Collaboration, formerly Avanan) for Microsoft 365, Gmail, Teams, Slack and file-sharing apps. Check Point says autonomous AI agents investigate threats, correlate activity into campaigns, prioritise incidents and orchestrate remediation. Check Point Infinity Platform for Government (which includes Harmony Email) is FedRAMP Moderate and GovRAMP Authorized at platform level; Check Point Harmony is TX-RAMP Level 2 — none of those registry rows name the AI agents. · Check Point Email Security AI agents (Harmony Email & Collaboration, formerly Avanan) pair comparison
- Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) — An AI agent that runs as a GitHub Action, takes vulnerabilities found by Contrast's IAST (Assess) and SAST, writes code fixes using runtime context, runs your build and tests, and opens pull requests for developers to review.
- Deep Fathom Compliance Readiness Platform (agentic CMMC / NIST SP 800-171 readiness) — CMMC and NIST SP 800-171 readiness platform for US defence contractors where AI agents interpret obligations, plan and advance routine readiness work, continuously map the CMMC boundary and collect evidence, with human review gates on consequential decisions.
- Ironscales AI agents (Phishing SOC Agent, Red Teaming Agent and Phishing Simulation Agent) — API-based email security for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace that runs three AI agents: a Phishing SOC Agent for L2-style forensic investigation of suspicious emails, a Red Teaming Agent that models attacks aimed at your organisation and hardens detection, and a Phishing Simulation Agent. Plans include agentic autonomous remediation. · Ironscales AI agents (Phishing SOC Agent, Red Teaming Agent and Phishing Simulation Agent) pair comparison
- ManageEngine Endpoint Central Zia Agents (EDR Event Triage, Device Investigation and Patch Troubleshooting agents) — Prebuilt AI agents in ManageEngine Endpoint Central that triage EDR events (MITRE ATT&CK mapping, prioritized next steps), investigate device problems and diagnose failed patches, plus Agent Studio for custom endpoint agents. · ManageEngine Endpoint Central Zia Agents (EDR Event Triage, Device Investigation and Patch Troubleshooting agents) pair comparison
- Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) — Cloud workspace security for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 with an AI agent that triages, clusters and remediates user-reported phishing across the organisation, plus an OAuth Remediation Agent that investigates third-party app and AI-agent grants and can revoke tokens on its own. Per-user pricing is published. · Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) pair comparison
- Phished AI security agents (Report Triage, Orchestration, Simulation and Real-Time Protection agents) — Belgian human-risk platform with a suite of AI agents that run the phishing training programme (orchestration, simulation, brand, supplier and deepfake simulation agents), triage every reported email with a verdict and a drafted reply, and check clicked links in an isolated environment in real time. New content needs admin approval and every action is logged. · Phished AI security agents (Report Triage, Orchestration, Simulation and Real-Time Protection agents) pair comparison
- Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent) — Agentic AI layer inside Proofpoint's platform. The Satori Abuse Mailbox Agent classifies every user-reported email that needs manual review (phish, malware, spam or clean) and can trigger configured quarantine or tagging workflows. A DLP Triage Agent does the same for data-loss alerts, with guardrails, chat explanations and audit logs. · Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent) pair comparison
- StrongestLayer TRACE agents (Inbox Advisor, Threat Triage and Threat Hunt) — AI-native email security for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace in which a multi-LLM reasoning engine (TRACE) investigates each email's intent against your business context and blocks attacks. Three classes of agents give employees plain-English verdicts in Outlook and Gmail, send pre-investigated, MITRE-mapped cases to the SOC, and hunt and remediate across mailboxes. · StrongestLayer TRACE agents (Inbox Advisor, Threat Triage and Threat Hunt) pair comparison
- Sublime Security ASA and ADÉ (Autonomous Security Analyst and Autonomous Detection Engineer) — Email security platform whose AI agents triage user-reported and flagged emails end to end (ASA, with passive or active auto-remediation modes) and write backtested detections for new attacks (ADÉ), which default to one-click human approval and can auto-activate when they clear a precision threshold. Runs as SaaS or self-hosted in AWS, including GovCloud. · Sublime Security ASA and ADÉ (Autonomous Security Analyst and Autonomous Detection Engineer) pair comparison
- Veeam PrivacyOps AI agents (Consent Agent, DSR and Assessment agents) — Privacy-operations agents on Veeam's DataAI Command Platform: a generally available Consent Agent that builds, tests, monitors and auto-remediates consent across sites and downstream systems, plus announced DSR intake-form and assessment-autofill agents.
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 13 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Cloud security (CNAPP) AI agents — 7 listings (Cloud and container security posture, exposure and remediation)
Related
- Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) alternatives
- Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
More Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)