SecurityScorecard vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
SecurityScorecard (SecurityScorecard) and CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) (Thomson Reuters) are both listed in the Risk category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only SecurityScorecard is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001. Only CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) is tagged for TX-RAMP.
| Field |  SecurityScorecard | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | SecurityScorecard | Thomson Reuters |
| HQ | United States · North America | Canada · North America |
| Primary category | Risk | Risk |
| Also listed in | Risk, Security | Risk, Compliance |
| Summary | Third-party cyber risk platform with security ratings and TITAN AI agents running TPRM intake, assessment, monitoring and remediation. | Agentic investigation tool built on Thomson Reuters CLEAR public-records data. From a plain-language question it plans and runs searches across CLEAR data and the open web, resolves conflicting records and returns concise cited findings with a record of the searches it ran, for AML, fraud, program-integrity and law-enforcement investigators. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | TX-RAMP |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | FedRAMP (In Process) |
| Capabilities / tasks | vendor risk, security ratings, questionnaire automation, remediation | case investigation, aml, fraud detection, government compliance |
| Pricing (as published) | Not verified | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://securityscorecard.com/ | https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/products/clear-investigate |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://securityscorecard.com/ | https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/products/clear-investigate |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with SecurityScorecard or CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) — KYC/KYB and compliance platform whose AI agents review AML screening hits (sanctions, PEP, adverse media) and recommend a decision under the customer's AML policy, check business websites for legitimacy and risk with ongoing monitoring, and review documents, with an analyst confirming the outcome. · AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) pair comparison
- CleverChain AI agents (VERA autonomous due diligence and LUMA screening) — KYB, KYC, AML and third-party due-diligence platform where the VERA agent runs end-to-end investigations (ownership chain, business activity, sanctions and adverse media) into a cited, policy-mapped report, and LUMA handles AML screening and ongoing monitoring, with analysts approving high-risk decisions. · CleverChain AI agents (VERA autonomous due diligence and LUMA screening) pair comparison
- Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) — German agent that completes incoming security questionnaires (vendor assessments, TISAX, ISO 27001, DORA) in Excel, PDF, Word or vendor portals from the customer's policies, certificates and past answers, with a source citation on every answer, consistent answers to re-worded questions, expert routing and team approval.
- Genpact Transaction Monitoring Analyst (Banking Analyst Suite) — Generally available agentic AML module for banks: a central orchestrator coordinates specialised agents that gather data, analyse transactions and customer behaviour, review prior alerts and deliver a decision-ready Level 1 alert recommendation with documented rationale, with analysts making every final decision. · Genpact Transaction Monitoring Analyst (Banking Analyst Suite) pair comparison
- Optivalue.ai questionnaire agents (security questionnaires, TISAX and third-party collection) — French platform whose agents answer incoming security questionnaires, TISAX catalogues, DDQs and tenders from the customer's own evidence with document, page and version on every answer, score and gap-check the result and draft missing documents with the team before named sign-off, while its Reach product sends questionnaires to suppliers and chases non-responders automatically.
- Oscilar Agent Hub (AML, sanctions, fraud and onboarding agents) — Risk-decisioning platform with 30+ orchestrated agents on a shared risk memory, including AML L1 review, sanctions screening dispositions, adverse media, EDD dossier, SAR narrative, fraud L1 review, fraud-network and KYB review agents, where every recommendation is confirmed by a human analyst. · Oscilar Agent Hub (AML, sanctions, fraud and onboarding agents) pair comparison
- RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) — AI workforce of five lead agents and 27 specialists that runs third-party risk end to end: vendor outreach, onboarding and questionnaire chasing, document assessment, outside-in breach and score monitoring, regulatory gap analysis and remediation, and regulator-ready reporting, with Manual, Assisted or Autonomous mode set per vendor. · RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) pair comparison
- VAAS AI risk agents (KYC/KYB, AML and onboarding risk decisions) — Brazilian risk and compliance decisioning platform whose AI agents read the full KYC/KYB dossier, compare it with current regulation, flag risks such as adverse-media homonyms, and suggest a justified decision with a confidence level for the analyst to validate, with continuous re-analysis when a monitored person or company changes. · VAAS AI risk agents (KYC/KYB, AML and onboarding risk decisions) pair comparison
- Vulcan Justinian (AI agent for government legal, regulatory and permitting work; VulcanGov) — AI agent for US government knowledge workers, grounded in a large corpus of federal and state statutes, regulations, court cases and fiscal data. It runs 50-state research in parallel with citations, monitors legal changes, reviews permit applications against the code, drafts memos and comment responses, and builds internal tools inside the agency boundary.
Use-case comparisons
- AML and transaction-monitoring AI agents — 32 listings (Anti-money-laundering, transaction monitoring and financial-crime investigation)
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 23 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 24 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- SecurityScorecard alternatives
- CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) alternatives
- Best risk AI agents
More SecurityScorecard comparisons
- LogicGate Risk Cloud vs SecurityScorecard
- OneTrust vs SecurityScorecard
- SecurityScorecard vs UpGuard
- BigID vs SecurityScorecard
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) vs SecurityScorecard
More CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) comparisons
- BigID vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
- OneTrust vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
- CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) vs UpGuard
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
- Black Kite AI Agent vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)