Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) vs Kalpita CodeGuard
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) and Kalpita CodeGuard (Kalpita Technologies) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Escape | Kalpita Technologies |
| HQ | France · Europe | India · India |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps. | Indian autonomous DevSecOps agent that scans each commit, generates a secure patch and opens a human-approved pull request. |
| Framework tags (Agent Index) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, pen test management, attack surface | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, secrets detection, iac |
| Pricing (as published) | Quote-based | Not published (demo request). |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://escape.tech/blog/introducing-cascade-the-multi-agent-penetration-testing/ | https://www.kalpitatechnologies.com/products/kalpita-codeguard |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://escape.tech/ | https://www.kalpitatechnologies.com/products/kalpita-codeguard |
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) or Kalpita CodeGuard. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting — Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report.
- Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) — Cycode's AppSec AI agents that assess the exploitability of findings, generate fixes, analyse change impact and query the risk graph inside the Cycode platform. · Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) pair comparison
- Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) — UK AI code-security agent platform with reachability-validated scanning, PR scanning, IDE/agent integrations and an agent that writes risk-tiered fix PRs. · Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) pair comparison
- Synack Sara AI Pentesting — Synack's Autonomous Red Agent (Sara) for agentic pentesting, with exploitable findings validated by the Synack Red Team.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 23 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 12 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) alternatives
- Kalpita CodeGuard alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Claude Code security review vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)